Om Parkash Since Deceased Through Kailash Rani v. Baldev Singh Sran And Others

COCP No.3537 of 2019 -1-


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** COCP No.3537 of 2019 Date of Decision: 18.10.2019 Om Parkash, working as Lineman, O/o Senior Executive Engineer/Operation Division, PSPCL, Bathinda Petitioner

Versus

Er. Baldev Singh Sran, Chairman-cum-Managing Director, PSPCL, Patiala and others Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

The contempt petition has been filed pleading wilful disobedience of order dated 27.03.2018 passed in bunch of writ petitions main being CWP No.17100 of 2016.

Notice of motion.

On asking of the Court, Mr. Sehajbir Singh, Advocate who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that matter is similar to COCP No.2877 of 2019 which was disposed of on 24.09.2019.

Learned counsel for the respondents candidly submits PANKAJ BAWEJA 2019.10.18 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh

COCP No.3537 of 2019 -2that respondents preferred LPA and thereafter SLP, which were dismissed. He states that needful will be done within a period of eight weeks from today.

In view of above, the contempt petition is disposed of. The petitioner would be at liberty to revive the contempt petition, in case, the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents today in Court is not adhered to. It is further clarified that in case, the petitioners are forced to revive the contempt petition, costs may be imposed.

[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE October 18, 2019
 
 



 

             PANKAJ BAWEJA 2019.10.18 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh