Mohammad Munad v. Union Of India And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 106-1

  

CWP No.21940 of 2023 Date of Decision:30.10.2023 Mohammad Munad ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Gulzar Mohd., Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Neha Sharma, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to decide application dated 12.07.2023 seeking re-issuance of passport. 2.

The petitioner was issued passport which is going to expire on 18.02.2024. The petitioner is a minor and staying with his mother. The respondent is seeking particulars of father's passport, however, petitioner is not staying with his father because parents of the petitioner are not in cordial relations. The petitioner is unable to get consent as well as documents of his father.

3.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that as per her instructions, the petitioner may be directed to appear before passport PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.10.30 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP No.21940 of 2023 -2-

  

authority alongwith requisite documents. The passport authority would look into the matter and pass an appropriate order. 4.

Without commenting upon merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to appear before passport authority alongwith his mother and documents available with him on 16.11.2023. The respondents shall consider case of the petitioner in terms of instructions issued by Government of India from time to time and pass an appropriate order within four seeks thereafter. 5.

In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 30.10.2023 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes


   PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.10.30 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment