Saminder v. Nikhil

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH TA No.454 of 2015 Date of decision: 03.02.2016 Saminder Sathi ....Applicant

Versus

Nikhil Mali ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties state that this application has been rendered infructuous as the parties have settled the matter. Dismissed as infructuous.

(Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal) Judge February 03, 2016 R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2016.02.08 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document