High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/9281/2024dismissed

Ravinder Singh v. State Of Haryana

2024-09-23Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta2 pages

CRWP-9281-2024 (O&M) -1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-9281-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.09.2024 Ravinder Singh .... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Randeep S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Deepshikha Chauhan, A.A.G., Haryana.

***** NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present criminal Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside order dated 06.08.2024 (Annexure P1) vide which the pre-mature release case of the petitioner was wrongly rejected by the respondents State Level Committee, as its amount to Double Jeopardy and wrong interpretation of the provisions of Premature Policy dated 13.08.2008, by passing illegal, arbitrary and Sisyphean order contending that the petitioner does not deserve any concession of Government at the present state because of factual matrix of the case for which he is convicted and deferred the case adjudication for a further period of one year. The petitioner has undergone the requisite sentence as per para 2(b) of the policy dated 13.08.

2008 and further detention of the petitioner is illegal, violative of Article 14, 16 of the Constitution of India and its amount to Double Jeopardy and required to be released forthwith as per para 2(b) of the Policy dated 13.08.2008 DIVYANSHI 2024.09.

CRWP-9281-2024 (O&M) -2 - (Annexure P-2) and in view of the judgment passed by this Hon'ble High Court in "Pohlu @ Polu Ram vs. State of Haryana and Others" bearing CRWP No.8232-2022 vide order dated 05.02.2024 and in case titled "Raju @ Rajesh vs. State of Haryana and Others" bearing CRWP No.2160-2024 vide order dated 11.03.2024.

After arguing the matter for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere; learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. Permitted to do so.

Dismissed as withdrawn..

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. 23.09.2024 (NIDHI GUPTA) Divyanshi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No DIVYANSHI 2024.09.25 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document