State Of Haryana v. Ram Mehar

CRM-A-864-2022 STATE OF HARYANA VS RAM MEHAR

Present:

Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. D.S. Virk, Advocate for the respondent.

*** CRM-A-864-2022 Counsel for the State submits that they have a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for convicƟon of the private respondents. There is no appreciaƟon of evidence in judgment of acquiƩal dated 25.05.2022. Counsel appearing for the respondent oppose the prayer. Leave to appeal granted.

Registry to assign number to appeal.

Main appeal Heard.

AdmiƩed.

The accused - respondent to execute a bond for aƩendance within two months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed. Given above, the accused - respondent shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Twenty Five Thousand only (INR 25,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty Five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the saƟsfacƟon of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accepƟng the sureƟes, the concerned Court must saƟsfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing them before the Court.

The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all sƟpulaƟons, terms, and condiƟons of this order. Registry to communicate this order to the trial Court without any delay. In case of failure of respondent to furnish bond, the concerned Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.

SANGEETA 2026.02.19 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-A-864-2022 -2- There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and aƩest it to be a true copy. In case the aƩesƟng officer wants to verify the authenƟcity, such an officer can also verify its authenƟcity and may download and use the downloaded copy for aƩesƟng bonds. It is clarified that, in case, the respondent feels and adverse situaƟon because of the pendency of the present maƩer, liberty is reserved to file an applicaƟon. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) February 18, 2026 JUDGE Sangeeta SANGEETA 2026.02.19 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document