M/S Ved Parkash Anil Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH




CWP No.22049 of 2023 Date of Decision:03.10.2023 M/s Ved Parkash Anil Kumar ....Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Daman Dhir, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G.Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to allot paddy as per milling policy for the year 2023-2024.

2.

The petitioner is engaged in the business of milling rice. The petitioner is dependent upon paddy supplied by the State Government Agencies. The State Government every year frames milling policy known as Kharif Marketing Season Policy (KMS). Like other years the respondent has framed KMS Policy for 2023-2024. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent is not allotting paddy to the petitioner as per its entitlement. 3.

The petitioner submits that this Court in CWP-13260-2020 vide order dated 01.09.2020 has directed the respondents to decide representation. In present case, the petitioner has filed representation dated PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.10.03 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP No.22049 of 2023 -2- 2023:PHHC:127417 11.09.2023(Annexure P-4) before the respondents who are not paying heed to the aforesaid representation.

4.

The respondent No.4 is directed to look into the representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order within two weeks from today. 5.

Disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 03.10.2023 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: Yes/No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.10.03 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment