Pritam Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 124 Civil Writ Petition No.22471 of 2023 Date of Decision: October 06, 2023 Pritam Singh ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENT(S) . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA . . .

PRESENT: - Mr. Sajjan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. . . .

Tribhuvan Dahiya, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 25.05.2023, Annexure P-6, whereby the petitioner's request regarding transfer/adjustment has been declined. 2.

Learned counsel contends that the petitioner is similarly placed as employees/petitioners in CWP No.13846 of 2023, who have been allowed to make a comprehensive representation showing that the posts are still lying vacant and they can be considered for adjustment against the same. He may, therefore, also be permitted to make a fresh representation on the same lines, and the respondents may be directed to decide the same within a specified period.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Parveen Mehta, DAG, Haryana, appearing on advance notice, submits that in case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be decided expeditiously.

5.

In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the PAYAL 2023.10.06 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

2023:PHHC:129655 CWP No.22471 of 2023 [2] petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the respondents within a period of one week from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioners, the same shall be decided by the respondents by passing a speaking order thereupon, within a period of four weeks from the date of receiving any such representation. (Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge October 06, 2023 payal Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No PAYAL 2023.10.06 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment