Dushyant Chautala v. Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 30048 of 2019 Date of Decision: February 06 , 2020.

Dushyant Chautala ...... PETITIONER (s)

Versus

Union of India and others ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Mr. N.S.Shekhawat, Advocate and Mr. Rajinder Banku, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Satyapal Jain, Addl.Solicitor General of India with Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Namit Kumar, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.

Mr. Pawan Girdhar, Addl.AG, Haryana for respondent No.3.

*****

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ***** LISA GILL, J.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the required security cover (Z-category) has been provided to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is, thus, rendered infructuous.

Petition is accordingly disposed of.

( LISA GILL ) February 06 , 2020.

JUDGE 'om'

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No OMKAR SINGH 2020.02.11 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh