Mukhtyar Singh v. Udmi Ram And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2136 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision:18.3.2019 Mukhtyar Singh ... Appellant Vs.

Udmi Ram and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Ms. Sona Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advocate for the appellant.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) As per office report, the costs of Rs.7,000/- have not been deposited by the learned counsel for the appellant which was imposed, vide order dated 27.11.2018 on account of adjournments being sought. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant cannot be contacted for deposit of the aforementioned costs. Dismissed for non-prosecution.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE March 18, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2019.03.18 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh