Aruna v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-M No. 47345 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 47345 of 2024 Date of Decision: 23.09.2024 Aruna ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Ms. Ravisha Mahajan, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Ms. SwaƟ Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

1.

Seeking issuance of appropriate direcƟons to respondents No.2 to 5 to conduct free and fair invesƟgaƟon on the complaint filed by the peƟƟoner, the peƟƟoner has come up before this Court under SecƟon 528 BNSS. 2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner submits that the peƟƟoner would be contended and saƟsfied if she is permiƩed to file a fresh representaƟon before the Commissioner of Police within 15 days and the concerned officer is directed to decide the same in a Ɵme bound manner.

3.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

4.

State counsel submits that they would take decision on the fresh representaƟon, if any filed within a period of three months. 5.

In view of prayer made by counsel for the peƟƟoner, she is permiƩed to file fresh representaƟon before respondent No.3 within 15 days menƟoning her e-mail ID as well as of her counsel and respondent No.3 i.e. Commissioner of Police is directed to decide the same, if filed either himself/herself or by delegaƟng the same to any Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.24 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 47345 of 2024 officer not below the rank of IPS, within a period of two months by passing a speaking and reasoned order and such order be also communicated to the peƟƟoner as well as her counsel on the e-mail ID provided on the representaƟon. 6.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoner and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. 7.

PeƟƟon is disposed of with the observaƟons menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 23.09.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.24 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh