Manager Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-M No. 47734 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 47734 of 2024 Date of Decision: 23.09.2024 Manager Singh ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Lalit Singla, Advocate and Ms. Varsha Sharma, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Ms. SwaƟ Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police StaƟon SecƟons 05.07.2024 Khanauri, District Sangrur 379-B, 323, 341, 506, 148, 149, 427 IPC 1.

Seeking transfer of invesƟgaƟon in the FIR capƟoned above, the peƟƟoner has come up before this Court under SecƟon 528 BNSS. 2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner submits that the peƟƟoner would be contended and saƟsfied if he is permiƩed to file a fresh representaƟon before the Deputy Inspector General of Police or Inspector General of Police concerned within 15 days and the concerned officer is directed to decide the same in a Ɵme bound manner. 3.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

4.

State counsel submits that they would take decision on the fresh representaƟon, if any filed within a period of three months. Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.26 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 47734 of 2024 5.

In view of prayer made by counsel for the peƟƟoner, he is permiƩed to file fresh representaƟon within 15 days menƟoning his e-mail ID as well as of his counsel and the DIG/IGP concerned is directed to decide the same, either himself/herself or by delegaƟng the same to any officer not below the rank of IPS, within a period of two months by passing a speaking and reasoned order and such order be also communicated to the peƟƟoner as well as his counsel on the e-mail ID provided on the representaƟon.

6.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoner and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. 7.

PeƟƟon is allowed with the observaƟons menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 23.09.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.26 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh