← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/52144/2022dismissed

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Singh v. State Of Punjab

2024-11-12Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52144-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.11.2024 AJAY KUMAR @ AJAY SINGH ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Impinder Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Navdeep Singh, DAG, Punjab.

***** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner is seeking the concession of bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.141 dated 23.06.2022 under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, registered at Police Station City Muktsar, District Sri Muktsar Sahib. 2.

In compliance of order dated 04.10.2024, status report by way of affidavit of Sh.Satnam Singh, PPS Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Sri Muktsar Sahib, District Sri Muktsar Sahib has been filed by the learned State counsel on behalf of respondent No.1 in Court today. The same is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. A copy thereof has been furnished to learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

Learned State counsel has drawn the attention of this Court to paragraph 6 of the affidavit and contended that in compliance of order dated 04.10.2024, the petitioner was examined at GGS Medical College POONAM RATHORE 2024.11.13 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-52144-2022 (O&M) -2Hospital, Faridkot where on examination, the doctor gave the following opinion:

"Pt's last visit on 20.05.2024.

Examined on 20.05.2024.

As compared with previous examination, Pt. Improved. Pt. Is hemodynamically stable at present."

4.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the State that it is evident that the condition of the petitioner is now stable and good otherwise he would have continued to go for his follow-ups. 5.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not deem it appropriate to extend the extraordinary concession of bail. 6.

Accordingly, the instant petition is hereby dismissed. However, it is made clear that anything observed hereinabove shall not be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE November 12, 2024 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2024.11.13 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh