Ranjeet v. State Of Haryana
! " # $%!$&'()*+ ,-)%*) !'!%.%*
%*) !'!%.%* /*0$ 12
!"# $
%&' %& () %(%% *& *+ *,'%'-()'(%%( %(./ "0
$!
%
!"# 1 2 2 2 34 "1
%) () %(%%
&((
1 43 1 5 "222 0 2
0 (.
% 1 6 411 2 " 1
4
1 2 4 1
4
2 7 1
1 00732
7 5 12 4
8 !"#
1 # 1 (- (, %(%% 8 2
1 82 22 7 0
9 !
1
0
222 %+ (& %(%- 2 0 1 0# . .,&'.%(%* 121211 '( (- %(%* 0 1
'
: 2 2 2 2
2 . 1 0 0 (*
%(%- 1 . 2 # ;/
0 2 1 .
2
*
2 2
0 14
1 . 2 # ;
/
0 (*
%(%-
-
7 0 1
)
1 2!"# 1
0 1
1 ('(%2 (+ %
%(%- "
(% 1 5
2 . 2 # ;/
0 (*
%(%- $ 2
&
7
1
0
+
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ashim @ Asim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya @ Asim Harinath Bhattacharya @ Aseem Kumar Bhattacharya Vs. National Investigation Agency, 2022(1) SCC 695 has held as under:
not consistent with Article 21 of the Constitution of India. While deprivation of personal liberty for some period may not be avoidable, period of deprivation pending trial/appeal cannot be unduly long. At the same time, timely delivery of justice is part of human rights and denial of speedy justice is a threat to public confidence in the administration of justice." ,
7
<
2 0 ('
(& %(%*3* 4156 7879 7 7 / 51%##1:
: ; 1 22 0 .
"
(
70 1
2 22 2 1 2
0 24
1 .
1
=
0 = $
> 2
0%*) !'!%.%*2
*+4)
?4= @=$
?
@=$