Shinda v. Gurdev Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RSA No.240 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Order: 24.09.2018 Shinda ..Appellant

Versus

Gurdev Singh ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Kartik Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent has stated that the land in dispute has already been sold in favour of the appellant. Hence, he submitted that the appeal has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instructions in this regard.

Keeping in view the statement made by counsel for the respondent, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to counsel for the appellant to move an application for revival, if the facts are otherwise. September 24, 2018 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) nt JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2018.09.25 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh