Sultan Singh v. Prabha Goyal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.101 COCP-2452-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.08.2025 SULTAN SINGH ....Petitioner

Versus

PRABHA GOYAL .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Ms. Mamta Saini, Advocate for Mr. Ravi Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Amar Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Karanjeet Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) At this stage, both the counsel submits that in consonance with the order, copy whereof is Annexure P-1, the financial benefits to the extent of 95%, as due, have already been paid to the petitioner. Also, counsel for the respondent has brought to the notice of the court that the residue 5% amount has been retained only with the purpose of clearance of the income tax dues, to be paid on this amount.

Learned counsel for the respondent has also given an undertaking that the residue amount shall be paid by the respondent, as and when the income tax dues are cleared.

In view of the undertaking so given by the counsel for the respondent, counsel for the petitioner submits that she does not want to pursue with the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly.

Sonu 2025.08.26 15:30 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC

However, counsel for the applicant makes a prayer that some time bound direction be given to the respondent, to make payment, if found over and above the clearance of income tax dues. In view of the submission, so made, the respondent is hereby directed to make the payment, after the clearance of the income tax dues, within a period of six weeks.

(ARCHANA PURI) 25.08.2025 JUDGE Sonu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.08.26 15:30 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC