Suberamanni And ORS v. Haryana Development Authority And ORS


  
  




!"#$ "%&'&#( ))

*+", - ((& (.#!/",'

)))00"11 (!'

2",'*'

 ,3 (  "4"1#0-"(!*!/#,&!3 (.#!/",'

)))
"'0#(."(!'

 

 

   

     

      



 

  

 

 

  !

! 



  !!

!







 

  $  

 



!



 

%

&

 # 



 



'



(
)*)

! +
))'

"    



  





 

#  



"!



 , " 

% -

. #

   $     #



( #
)*)

 



/ & 0 $-  1

! + #
))'

1 !

 #

 2

     "

 

 




))-   

 # %5
'

 





) #





 , " 

#

 " 

  1 !

     

"



"

!

  



 "



 #


) #

 

 

# 

 

 

!





 



 

4!

!!

!

  









   

  

!

  %- 5* %5
7 

! 



8  

! 

!  # #
))- # !

! ,#     





  

  "

  

 "! 

&



  $    

'

  





.

    



 ! ! 

"

 

*





 

"

"



"

.



  #
))-

 !



  



.





  

# ! 



* # !



 "!



 



 

"



"



"

 ,



"!

1   

:

 #

"



"  

!

, 

 

  

!

3;"   &

.

  8   <&= >

%-%%5$%-%%

%559 

"#$  

$

"

%  

% & '

  5) %5
'

 

!

'



!

 $ "13. In Syndicate Bank v. General Secretary, Syndicate Bank Staff Association & Anr., AIR 2000 SC 2198; and Aligarh Muslim University & Ors. v. Mansoor Ali Khan, AIR 2000 SC 2783, this Court ruled that if a person is absent beyond the prescribed period for which leave of any kind can be granted, he should be treated to have resigned and ceases to be in service. In such a case, there is no need to hold an enquiry or to give any notice as it would amount to useless formalities. A similar view has been reiterated in V.C. Banaras Hindu University & Ors. v. Shrikant, AIR 2006 SC 2304; Chief

- Engineer (Construction) v. Keshava Rao (dead) by Lrs., (2005) 11 SCC 229; and Regional Manager, Bank of Baroda v. Anita Nandrajog, (2009) 9 SCC 462."

)

3

!





  !



 

5

> 

! 

 !



" !   

!



/

5 3 6


5
 kanchan

  Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No