Sandeep @ Sanda v. State Of Haryana

247 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-50431-2023 Date of Decision: November 21, 2023 Sandeep @ Sanda

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Mandeep Singh Kundu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.

DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) Status report by way of affidavit of Shri Dharamvir Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Head Quarters, Panipat on behalf of respondent-State along with custody certificate has been filed. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed on record copy of statement of injured Ved Rattan examined as PW-2 during trial. 3.

This is the third petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.18, dated 17.01.2023, under Sections 308, 323, 325 and 506 read with Section 34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Model Town Panipat, District Panipat. 4.

The earlier two petitions were dismissed as withdrawn. 5.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that as per FIR, the attribution to the petitioner is to have given brick blows on the head and face of injured Ved Rattan, though the major injuries are attributed to have been caused by co-accused Amandeep with an axe on the head and right leg of the injured.

6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has then pointed out towards the statement made by Ved Rattan during trial in which he SARITA RANI 2023.11.20 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/order

CRM-M-50431-2023 - 2 - attributed injuries with brick to the petitioner to have been caused only on his mouth.

7.

As per the instructions supplied by ASI Raj Pal, learned State counsel could not refute the aforesaid contentions. 8.

As per the custody certificate, the petitioner is in custody for the last 09 months and 23 days. He has no other criminal case pending against him.

9.

Having regard to all the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that the trial may take time to conclude, but without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted to bail. He is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing requisite bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.

Allowed.

November 21, 2023 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No SARITA RANI 2023.11.20 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/order