Nihal Singh v. State Of Haryana
!!!!
"#$ %& $'()(%* +,+
- . +
/ /
!"# $
%%%%% /
+
.
&
' (
)*+ , ,!
" - - ./ &0*
&1 2) 02&+
*23 #
*) /
,
$
4
5
-#
&2 020* .
$
460-
-
#
*
7 ./#
!
"! #
!
4 # #"
$
# # 6 !
/# 7- ##
,! !
87 # 9 ,!8 4
/ #
4 #
: 7 /
! # '
( ! 0;
222:6! #
! ! /
# ! !
!- "
/# 7- !#
!
!
'
(
! !
9
&2 02&+ #
! !
! # ;61 !
!# !
!
<
" ! 8
! # &3 2) 02&+
!
! :"
# ! !!
suicide by hanging himself.
Accordingly, the aforesaid case FIR was got registered. 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has no concern with the suicide committed by Kiranpal. It is submitted that the petitioner neither acquire any knowledge with regard to the money transactions in question
nor he ever visited the house of deceased-Kiranpal. It is submitted that with regard to the alleged money transactions, Kiranpal had got registered one FIR against the petitioner along with other accused persons, vide FIR No.1259 dated 21.11.2016, under Sections 406, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, which is pending consideration before the Courts at Karnal. It is stated that the petitioner never extended any threats to the deceased-Kiranpal. Learned counsel contends that neither any specific allegations have been levelled against the petitioner in the alleged suicide note of deceased-Kiranpal nor any date on the said suicide note is forthcoming. It is next submitted that there is nothing on record to show that by way of which mode or manner the petitioner had allegedly harassed/tortured deceased-Kiranpal, which may constitute abetment to commit suicide.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that co-accused, namely Rajinder and Rohtas, have already been granted the concession of regular bail by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal. Copies thereof are handed over by learned counsel for the petitioner in Court today, which are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. 6.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for the last more than one year; investigation in this case is complete, challan stands presented and even charges have been framed on 19.09.2022 and out of total seventeen prosecution witnesses, no one has been examined till date.
# !
!
# - #
=
-!
, - - !- ! - , -
,
-!
7.
On the other hand, l
-
, however, while relying upon the status report dated 10.02.2023, it is not disputed that investigation in this case is complete, challan stands presented and charges have been framed on 19.09.2022 and also that the petitioner is in custody for more than one year in this case. It is also not disputed that out of total seventeen prosecution witnesses, no one has been examined by now. 8.
/
-"
#
9.
&2 020* he petitioner is in custody in the present case for a period of more than one year;nvestigation in this case is complete, challan stands presented and even charges have been framed on 19.09.2022. Out of total seventeen prosecution witnesses, no one has been examined till date. Moreover, co-accused, namely Rajinder and Rohtas, have already been granted the concession of regular bail by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal. T "
!
#- -"
- -
&2
# !
!
#
- --
-:
-
, :/>
:$
#
?
- !
-
!
?
- #
:
- !!
?
# 9
#
!-
?
# "
#
&&
/
' - ( .< $
'.
$ ( ! ;2 222:6 -! !
# , 9 !
#- - -
#
!- ! #
12.
< - - - - !
!
- -
&*
9
&)
'(
+,+
/
& @
" : : @
-
: