Sandeep Kaur And Another v. Tarunveer Singh Mavi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 110 (2 cases) CRR(F)-1116-2022 Date of Decision : 16.03.2023 Sandeep Kaur and another ......... Petitioners

Versus

Tarunveer Singh Mavi ......... Respondent 2.

CRR(F)-1352-2022 Tarunveer Singh Mavi ......... Petitioner

Versus

Sandeep Kaur and another ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr.Harneet Singh Oberoi, Advocate for the petitioners in CRR(F)-1116-2022 and for the respondents in CRR(F)-1352-2022.

Mr. Parampreet Singh Paul, Advocate for the petitioner in CRR(F)-1352-2022 and for the respondent in CRR(F)-1352-2022.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) The petitioner and respondent solemnised marriage on 16.11.2011 and from this wedlock, one male child was born. The couple could not enjoy the fruits of married life and they parted their ways. The wife filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance which came up for consideration before Principal Judge, Family Court, SAS Nagar, Mohali. The Family Court vide order dated 22.09.2022 granted interim maintenance of Rs.7,000/- per month to wife and Rs.5,000/- per month to minor child.

ANJU GOEL 2023.03.16 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRR(F)-1116-2022 and other connected matter -2The husband [CRR(F)-1352 of 2022] as well as wife [CRR(F)- 1116 of 2022] have come up before this Court assailing the impugned order dated 22.09.2022. The husband is claiming that the amount of maintenance is on the higher side whereas the wife is claiming that it is on the lower side. On being confronted with the fact that maintenance granted is interim, learned counsel for the parties agreed not to press their petitions, however, prayed that the Family Court may be directed to finally determined the amount of maintenance without being influenced by observations made in the order granting interim maintenance.

Without commenting on the merits of case, the petitions stand disposed of with a request to the Family Court to expeditiously adjudicate the question of maintenance and preferably within 08 months from today. The Family Court is further requested to consider all the arguments raised by both the parties and pass order without being influenced by observations made in the interim order.

A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case.

( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE 16.03.2023 anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ANJU GOEL 2023.03.16 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document