Sanam Deep Singh v. State Of Punjab
!"#$# %& '&
( ) & * * *
!
"
# * * + & ,- ./ $ ! %! &'( " " % ! % % )*+ ,'
-'
.'
,.,- ! ,,,( ! % !
!% %
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody from 13.03.2021, which is more than two years and one month and the charges in the present case were framed on 12.04.2022 which is also one year ago % !!! / 0 %% 1 the petitioner has clean antecedents and is not involved in any other case. He submitted that it is a case where the petitioner has been falsely implicated by the police due to the political enmity. He further
submitted that although the allegation against the petitioner was with regard to recovery of 990 tablets of Celcidal-100 SR having a salt of Tramadol which falls within the commercial quantity under the + ! ! ! '2 ! / %%%3 ! / !% !! !! !
!% ! % !3/ / /3 %! / / !%%!3 % ! %3 / 1 ! 3 !! ! %! % 1 ! %3 ! 3 % !
! / ! " ! %! !-4 / 5 !
% / 0 6,
6,2 5 %! " ! 3 ! 1 ! / /
%!/! %% / ! / / ! %%/ 1 ! / %3"% 5 / / % !3/
%% / ! "
%%3 * 8 / % 1 ! ! / 3 % ! ! %/ % ! %%/ ! " %of the same is that the petitioner had to face incarceration for more than two years.
!% Hon'ble " * !%0!- 123 - % #. 4& !% - . 2-! 2
%4!$ #5 # % %0 % 6!- ,.,, 9-.: "" ;- ! !
% ! !%3! )%
!! !%,- " * % % Hon'ble " 60 2$.#3 7 2$$ #% 4!-$2$ * ! ,
!.6#/ " % %+ (&'<,.,'
! ,4 .'
,.,'! !% ! ! '2 !/ %%%3! %%3! % !3 3 learned trial Court 1 3 3! % % On the other hand, "
% # has submitted, on instructions from the police official who is present in the Court, that it is correct that the petitioner is in custody since 13.03.2021 which is more than two years and the charges were also framed about one year ago i.e. on 12.04.2022 and no prosecution witness has been examined till date. She further submitted that it is also correct that the petitioner has clean antecedents and is not involved in any other case as per her instructions. She has however opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner on the ground that since the quantity recovered in the present case was a commercial quantity under the + ! 3
' is hit by the bar contained under Section 37 ! I have heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has already faced incarceration for more than two years and in the present case charges were framed more than one year ago. No prosecution witness has been examined till date. The petitioner has clean antecedents and is not involved in any other case. A perusal 5 / !
% / 6 %!3%!% 3 " 67/% / -4 !/3 learned trial Court 3 % %%// % ! ! %/ !! % !% / % !3 ! " ! !=3 %!% / / ! / 6 ! / / ! %%/ / /% 3 $ %// ! )%
!! %3 Hon'ble "
!9:
$ % &. !6 >&.
6! 9-:!! ! 3663 %% !% ! $ ! % %!
% !% ! 3 " !3 % / / 1/ 6 !% ! ! '.( ! / 3 !%!% % % %
!
$
! % 0! 3! ?!
%3 / 3 %3 ! ! /%! %3 % !%,- $ / !! !! $ % !!/ %! % ! % ?
3 ! % % % !!! !!3 !! /% % !%,- ?
% !/ %% !% % ! ! / !3 "= /!! 3 %% !! %3 !! % /@ @ A ! Hon'ble "
!9:
0"%/ / % %3 ! ! '2 ! $ % !6
! "##!$"!%
" & !#" " #" ! #'#
"
#$ !
! "#
8 ()* +, & " "'# # ! "- #! &. # # /" %
#! !
!
# " # %# # 01 23'
$ 4 ! ! # 56 "
()* 7# $ 8 +,, $+
6+5 5
9 * !% !! !! ! ! ! ! / % ! ! % " ! %% / % ! ! %/ ! %%/ $ " / %!3 / /3% /%% " / ! ! % %3 " $ % 3 ! $ " # % % %3 ! % % / 3 ! %3
! ! ! '2 !/ %% %3 ! ! ! ! '2 ! !! % !% !%! % 3 ! ! !% ! % % 3 !3! ! 1! ! ! ! '2 ! ! ! '2 !/ %% %3 ! ! %%3 ! ! ! !!% %
!%,- " * In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case and especially considering the long custody of the petitioner, this Court is of the view that the petitioner deserves the concession of regular bail. Consequently, the present petition is allowed. $ %%% % %! %<3 ! % %"<3 !! 1/ 3 %% 0 ! %3 ! ,* * / 9-#. +
?
B<+ ?
% B<+