Shyam Lal And ORS v. Anil Malik And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3100-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.09.2024 SHYAM LAL AND ORS ....Petitioner(s)
Versus
ANIL MALIK AND ORS
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present :
Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manish Dadwal, Asstt. A.G. Haryana.
Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate for respondent No.6. ***** HARKESH MANUJA. J. (Oral) 1.
By way of present petition filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, contempt proceedings are sought to be initiated against the respondents towards alleged willful non-compliance of order dated 24.02.2021 passed by this Court in CWP-22085-2020.
2.
Learned counsel representing the respondents on instructions submits that the necessary portal for the purposes of registration of the sale deeds in favour of the petitioners with respect to 100 sq.yds. plots shall become operational within a period of two days from today and the sale deeds shall be registered in their favour along with delivery of possession thereof within a period of 10 days from today.
3.
In view of the aforesaid undertaking, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. 4.
Dismissed as not pressed.
5.
Rule stands discharged.
SANDAL SHARMA 2024.09.26 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
COCP-3100-2023 (O&M) -26.
However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of each petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application.
(HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE S.Sharma(syr) Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/ No SANDAL SHARMA 2024.09.26 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment