Sohan @ Sonu v. State Of Haryana And Others

SOHAN @ SONU

Present:

Mr. Varun Dutta, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Rathee, Advocate, for the petitioner.

This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the representation made on 23.09.2022 for his temporary release on furlough. Counsel for the petitioner states that though 7 weeks have elapsed since the submission of the said representation, the respondents have not taken any action thereon.

Notice of motion.

Mr. S.S. Pannu, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and states on instructions that respondents No.2 and 4 will take appropriate action on the said representation within 2 weeks and communicate their decision to the petitioner. Having regard to the said submissions of the petitioner and the statement of learned State counsel, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.2 and 4 to take appropriate action/decision on the SURESH KUMAR 2022.11.17 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

petitioner's representation 23.09.2022 for grant on temporary release on furlough within 2 weeks and communicate their decision to the petitioner. (M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE November 16, 2022 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No SURESH KUMAR 2022.11.17 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2-