Mahna Ram v. Union Of India And ORS

RA-RF-274-CI-2016 IN RFA-193-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RA-RF-274-CI-2016 IN RFA-193-2013 Date of Decision: August 17, 2016 MAHNA RAM ...Applicant

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

Present:

Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate, for the applicant.

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the applicant has fairly stated that no such argument was raised which might have not been dealt with by this Court and may be made the basis for moving the instant review application. Neither there was any other material available on record which might have not been referred and discussed in the order under review, dated 23.2.2016, nor it is so argued on behalf of the applicant even today. In fact, learned counsel for the applicant wants to re-argue the case under the garb of instant application, which is not permissible in law. After hearing learned counsel for the applicant, no case for review has been made out.

Dismissed.

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE August 17, 2016 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned:

YES / NO Whether Reportable:

YES / NO Prashant Kapoor 2016.08.24 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document