Sanjeev Kumar And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP No.30761 of 2019 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.30761 of 2019 Date of decision:23.10.2019 Sanjeev Kumar and another ... Petitioners Vs.

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Pawan Attri, Advocate for the petitioners.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Prayer in present writ petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents no.4 and 5 to take back the petitioners in service till the regular appointment is made. Notice of motion.

On asking of Court, Mr.Hitesh Pandit, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents/State.

Mr.Pawan Attri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submits that petitioners, at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide legal notice dated 22.08.2019, (Annexure P-7) within some specified time. In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into merit of case or commenting thereon, SAVITA KADIAN 2019.10.29 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.30761 of 2019 {2} present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the legal notice dated 22.08.2019, (Annexure P-7) by passing a well reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

In case, legal notice is not decided within aforementioned specified time, there shall be costs of Rs.25,000/- to be paid by the concerned officer to the petitioners.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE October 23, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2019.10.29 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh