Mohinder Singh Gossal v. Surinder Kaur @ Shindo Kaur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.684 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision:05.09.2016 Mohinder Singh Gossal ... Appellant Vs.

Surinder Kaur @ Shindo Kaur ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Sukhjit Singh, Advocate for the appellant.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite his sincere efforts, he is not able to implead the LRs of the appellant. It seems that LRs of the appellant are not interested in pursuing the matter. Even otherwise, on merits, concurrent findings of facts are involved in the present case which are against the appellant-plaintiff. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive the same in case something survives. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 05, 2016 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2016.09.06 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh