Rajo Devi @Raj Kumari v. Canara Bank And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.32211 of 2019 Date of Decision: November 06, 2019 Rajo Devi @ Raj Kumari

...Petitioner

VERSUS

Canara Bank and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

Present:

Mr.Sawan Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has filed third party objections before the Recovery Officer and also an application for stay which has not been listed.

We have heard counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

Once the petitioner has already filed application for stay before the competent authority, we do not find any reason to interfere in this petition, which has been filed by invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Faced with these observations, counsel for the petitioner has prayed for withdrawal of this petition, in order to file another application before the competent authority to press the application for stay. VINEET GULATI 2019.11.07 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.32211 of 2019 -2On the request of counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE November 06, 2019 (SUVIR SEHGAL) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VINEET GULATI 2019.11.07 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh