Raj Bala v. Sham Lal And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.4031 of 2017 Date of Decision.27.02.2018 Raj Bala ......Appellant Vs Sham Lal and others ........Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Rajeev Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

-.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties have compromised the matter and therefore, no cause of action survives in the present regular second appeal arising out of the judgments and decrees of the Courts below.

In view of the statement of the counsel appearing for the appellant, the second appeal is dismissed as having infructuous in view of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 27, 2018 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.02.28 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document