Manpreet Kaur v. Rupinder Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH T.A. No.110 of 2014 Date of Decision.30.03.2015 Manpreet Kaur .......Petitioner

Versus

Rupinder Singh ......Respondent

Present:

Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Raman Mohinder Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The counsel appearing for the respondent husband says that he is proposing to have the application for restitution of conjugal rights filed under the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act dismissed as withdrawn.

2.

Having regard to the statement made, there is no requirement for transfer. The transfer application is disposed of and the respondent will be barred from prosecuting the case for restitution of conjugal rights. The statement of counsel is done at the instruction of the party who is present in Court and this order is directed to be communicated to the Court before which Section 9 petition is pending so that it shall not proceed to take up the case.

3.

The transfer application is disposed of with the above observations.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 30, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.04.06 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document