Sangeeta Kalia v. Vinod Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH T.A. No.226 of 2014 Date of Decision.05.05.2015 Sangeeta Kalia .......Petitioner

Versus

Vinod Kumar ......Respondent

Present:

Mr. P.K. Longia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Chaman Lal Panwar, Advocate for the respondent.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the respondent says that he is withdrawing the petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and therefore, there would not be any requirement for transfer. The statement is taken on record.

2.

The transfer application is dismissed as having become infructuous and the trial Court shall act on the submission made before this Court and will not allow for prosecution of the petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 05, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.05.20 12:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document