Raveena v. Birbal Khan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH TA No.340 of 2014 Date of decision: 28.01.2016 Raveena ....Petitioner

Versus

Birbal Khan ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate, for the respondent. PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent submits that this application has been rendered infructuous as parties have compromised the matter. He has handed over photocopy of compromise deed in this regard, same is taken on record.

Dismissed as infructuous. In case the statement is found to be incorrect, applicant will be at liberty to get this application revived. (Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal) Judge January 28, 2016 R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2016.01.29 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document