Jagdish Prasad v. State Of Haryana

-
-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.01.2023 

 ....Petitioner

Versus

 

  

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :

Mr. K.S. Siwach, Advocate for the petitioner.

       HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral)
 

  ! ! ""#!$

 % &' ( ' #!$ )*+ , , !

 "  &$ '' - #!$ .
$&   #!  !

'

$!     !

 "  #(  $& !

  "!!$  / ' #$(  &$ !

 ""# !0"!!$  (%! !

!

'$ $!  ! !$ " !

  ! ! ""#!$    '  $! " '

   !

 "!!$  &' ( ' #!$ ).* $& !

 ,$' $& ,  $#'(
12.  &$ - ! $&  !#"!$ % !$ !

 "!!$  

#   $+3
'!' +331+3++ - !' ( ' #!$
4  ' +20 5#! $6
7 $& #$!# (-  '

# $!$"# (% ! # #!
1*4 !

$# !!$ !!( 9   !#! !

%'

-+- On 30.11.2022, the following order was passed by this Court :-
 

        

  

        

       !"#$%& %&$& $%&%%  

   ' % ()*) #$+,#  -

    

  )  '    .



/ -

    $ 0       

       



 



          

    $1 

   2     

 !"             

  

    

   (  "

/34$1      2  



 



   52    $ !

   



  2    5     

    

 

   % ()

6

  

  $1  5  



      2    (     

       ( 6   

      

#- )   

  

    $!

   



 (  "

/34 #

 " 5    

  5    $$%&%%  

    )    

  7    $!

 

 



 

         2    8 

   5

    8      

  

    $ #   $ 9   :   

    4$  ):  #2  -); < 2      

 

     



  (  < $ 0  

          5      (:

         

 

$ )8  &$&$%&%$ ! 

 2  

5 



    



    

     



-.- ! 5

   =)

  9$   <25   

  8 

  5

     2   

! 5

       



      2     *%,$$$> Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Jaibir Singh has not disputed the aforesaid fact of joining the investigation by the petitioner and submits that his custodial interrogation is not required at this stage. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required at this stage, the present petition is allowed and the ad-interim order dated 30.11.2022 passed by this Court is made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to comply with any of the directions made above and the bail conditions, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of this anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner.

Nothing expressed here-in-above shall be construed to be an observation on merits of the case and the facts and circumstances recorded above are only for consideration of the prayer for anticipatory bail at this stage.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.

10.01.2023 (HARSH BUNGER) Amandeep JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No