Mukesh Kumar v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22669-2023 (O&M) Decided on : 09.10.2023 Mukesh Kumar . . .Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: Mr. Jagan Nath Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. A. G. Haryana.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1.

In the present petition, the claim of the petitioner is that he should be considered as Disabled Ex-Serviceman and not as a simple ExServiceman in respect of the selection being made in pursuance to the advertisement attached as Annexure P-1.

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. A. G. Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of State of Haryana-respondents. 4.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from Jagdeep Mittal, Legal Assistant, Haryana Staff Selection Commission, submits that the petitioner is being considered in the category of disabled Ex-Serviceman. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned State counsel, the present petition has been rendered RIYA 2023.10.11 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No. 22669-2023 (O&M) -22023:PHHC: 130448 infructuous, at this stage, and may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further.

6.

Ordered accordingly.

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 09.10.2023 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No RIYA 2023.10.11 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document