Rekha v. Vinay Talwar

T.A.No.443-2014 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A.No.443-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 31, 2015 Rekha .....Applicant

Versus

Vinay Talwar ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Sarvpreet Gurna, Advocate for the applicant-wife.

Mr.Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the respondent.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral) At the very outset, Mr.Amit Dhawan, learned counsel for the respondent-husband has pointed out that as per telephonic communication received from the counsel representing the respondent-husband in the trial Court, the case has been decided and a decree of divorce has been passed, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. MEENU 2015.04.01 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

T.A.No.443-2014 (O&M) (2) Learned counsel for the applicant-wife submits that exparte decree has been passed and the same has been confirmed from the counsel at Ludhiana. However, he submits that the present petition be kept pending so that the applicant-wife may move an application for setting aside the ex-parte decree before the Court below.

The prayer for adjournment of this petition by the learned counsel for the applicant-wife is declined. Since the case sought to be transferred from the learned trial Court, Jalandhar, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Ludhiana has already been decided, therefore, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly.

March 31, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.04.01 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh