Panna Lal Yadav v. State Of U.T. Chandigarh
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:- 07.05.2024 ....Petitioner(s)
Versus
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :
Mr. Dinesh Maurya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor for UT Chandigarh. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) 1.
The present petition under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of the impugned order dated 25.08.2009 (Annexure P-2) passed by learned !
"
#$ #$ ! %&'& !&()*+)), !
! !$! ! %$
&(-" &(*" &(." '+' %! %$ $ !" #$ #"
/#! !012! %$! #0!!$! !2 %3!%44!$! + ! $! %$ ! 4% #! 2! %$! # 03 ! # $ %32$! % #!% ! !'&&)+)+'2
!01 # % " #!2! %$!
# 22! !$ #!% $4 $ #!# !5 !00%$ !#
2!%$ !% %21%4 #! !!2 /#! !01 #!% #0!!$!2% !$ #! !
! 6!
#% 1" #$ #
-2- ' ! $! 0 % ! % # $% 2 ! #! 4% !
4 3 ( ! , $ #!% !%42 %!!$
%$'&&)+)+'" #!4%%/$
% ! / 2
!
!
"#
$
%&'
( ) %) *
+
) +
,
-- -
. /
) ) "#
$
%& ' 01
2 * #3
"#
$
%&4'
*
) 46
7 8 ) / / 9 %%:5 )
)
( &
8 ,
-- - "#
$
%& '
. /
) )
&
% 7
#*
8
;
<#,
-- 0 =6
$
)
) . /
;2/
;
-3-
) *
( 40 "') %) ! 5
8
)
)
$
8
) +
$
$ - 5
- ;& 2 1 (
# :5 )
> 7 8!!2$ $6!/ #!4 # #!2! %$! # !122! ! $ #!% $4 $ #!# !5 !09 ! 10%$ %$ !5!$ % #!
% ! !31.10.2023"2
!01 # % " #!2 !
!$ 2! %$ %/!
#!% ! ! 25.08.2009 (Annexure P-2)"2
!01! $!
!
"#$ # ! !$ #!$ ! 30 $ ! 6!% ! !'&&)+)+' #! !01%$4 3! 7.
The petition stands allowed.
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 07.05.2024 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?
Yes/No