Sunaina v. Saurav Chopra

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH T.A. No.55 of 2014 Date of Decision.24.04.2015 Sunaina .......Petitioner

Versus

Saurav Chopra ......Respondent

Present:

Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dhingra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rahul Rampal, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the transfer application has become infructuous and seeks for disposal of the same as such.

2.

The transfer application is disposed of as having become infructuous.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE April 24, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.04.24 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document