Gaurav Trading v. Food Corporation & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RA-RS-5-C of 2015 (O&M) in RSA No. 2966 of 2013 Date of Decision : 05.12.2016 Gaurav Trading Company, Ujhana ....Applicant

Versus

Food Corporation of India and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Arun Bansal, Advocate for the applicant-appellant.

Surinder Gupta, J.

CM-1175-C-2015 There is delay of 183 days in re-filing the review application. For the reasons stated in the application, which is supported by affidavit, the same is allowed and delay of 183 days in re-filing the review application is condoned.

RA-RS-5-C-2015 Heard.

Learned counsel for applicant-appellant submits that Rules 24 and 25 of Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (General) Rules, 1962 have not been properly interpreted in judgment dated 06.05.2014 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court (Hon'ble Judge has since retired). He seeks review of the judgment on this score.

Submission by learned counsel for the applicant-appellant makes out no ground for review of judgment. In fact applicant-appellant wants to argue the case again on merits.

I find no reason to recall judgment dated 06.05.2014. This review application has no merit.

Dismissed.

December 05, 2016 ( SURINDER GUPTA) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2016.12.09 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Whether Reportable Yes/No