Anjali v. Vinod

IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.117 TA-1046-2025 Date of Decision: 07.11.2025 ANJALI ....Applicant

Versus

VINOD ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI

Present:

Mr. Sanjeev Sharma Advocate for the applicant.

None for the respondent.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) As observed in the previous order, despite service, respondent had not made appearance. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent.

As such, the respondent is hereby proceeded against ex parte. At this stage, the counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to pursue with the transfer application and the same be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh, with better particulars. Ordered accordingly.

(ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE 07.11.2025 Preeti S.

Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No PREETI 2025.11.10 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document