Kala Singh And Another v. State Of Punjab





 
  


      



 !

"#$$% & '

(
 




 ( )

   #* ' $ (
  

$ ++++

Present:

Mr.   , Advocate
for the petitioners.

Mr. M.S. Atwal, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. S.S. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. G.S. Dhillon, Advocate for the complainant.



 

, $- '.


            !"  Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail for the petitioners in FIR No.287 dated 25.07.2025, under Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC registered at Police Station City Kharar, District S.A.S. Nagar Mohali.
"
 #"$
$!
"$"%&' (  ' 



  )*
+
  ,  &    !" (-& "$"./   .!'

'
0&     ,     &    1    2      3 4  2  &    )* / 01

  "

2-!.

)
$

 (  "-!. ( "

!2 $ /0    1   "!5 "%
$5
"$"% "$& "$* ( 4'

6    - 


  5% , /"0 7 6    8 ,

9
 "
 #   :

 2 ,       & 2 2,  ;&     6  &

 % "& 

& .&6

 &     2   -
"   
 < 2 22          ,    &   ,&   , 2,& 2,  
 .
 <       &       &  6       , 2 2&2, ;
= &    2 2  76 /  -
"0&  ,,22

 2,
3 2  2 &     
6    

 ,  $
$"
"$"%&  

     &    > > *"

 '    

       ?  "
$
"$"  />  * 0& >  , 6  ;  

   &6  &    :

           -
"     
4 &

& 2 ,     , 2& ;&  

 6 @  &    ,  -
"  & ?
9  & 34    2&6    2 
$1 2 1   2&  ,22

   ,
 %
    34   ,   2    2        &  2
= &      

2    2  

,             , 6 
4        , 2   

A &      2&2    

         
 B
 4

 

2& 2

 2      &   34        :

 
 ,&       

 ,        2 , &     , >2    

    
  &  &  17 

, 


   & ,    2   


& ,    

  ,      
 5
 - 2
 !
 #&9
- 79&
;C& 7 &        *&9
 9

&&9
C  & &             -
"D2
 = &    

    >:

 &          / 0  

:

   ,  A&  :

 

   , / 0&  1

2,
 8
 9&         7     :

   ,4  ,
 4         &     * 2 &

7 

     

   #


      ,    !"/"0 (-&"$"./   .!/"0'

'
0
 $
 (  &               

 4 , '  & ,

#  & 

2

&    ,

,

 
 4             , , 2   &   1   2

 ' 
 
  &          2   & &      9''   ' 
 "
 <          -
"D2

;&     9 ''   ' $%
$8
"$"%&       2 ,
 .
 < !

"$"%&  
 = &  9   ,   2,         6  &   2 

 ,   

 2
E
3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioners have not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case, the investigating agency requires the petitioners to appear, they shall make themselves available without demur.

4.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from, affirms the factum


of joining the investigation by the petitioners and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioners are not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners is allowed and the order dated 20.08.2025 granting interim bail to them, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (now 482(2) of BNSS, 2023)
6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioners fail to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to them.

-  

.

 ,%$