← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/25225/2024disposed of

Santra Devi v. Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank And ORS

2025-11-11Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar2 pages

CWP-25225-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-25225-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.11.2025 Santra Devi ....Petitioner

Versus

Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Present:

Mr. S.K. Daaria, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Tarun Dhingra, Advocate for the respondent/Bank.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing respondent No.2 to provide the details of the account in which the petitioner can deposit the amount received by her husband at the time of retirement for exercising the option for Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank Pension Regulation, 2018 and also direct to provide the details of total outstanding amount with interest. Further prayer has been made to direct respondent No.4 to take final decision on the issue of reopening of option exercising pension for remaining retired employees/officer.

MOHD YAKUB 2025.11.11 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

CWP-25225-2024 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the instant writ petition of the petitioner is treated as a comprehensive representation and the same be decided by respondent No.2 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. 3.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objection, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 for timebound consideration and decision thereof by passing a speaking order. 4.

Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.2 is directed to treat this writ petition as a comprehensive representation and consider the case of the petitioner and pass a speaking order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.2.

5.

Disposed of, accordingly.

(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 11.11.2025 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2025.11.11 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.