Sanjay v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-45681-2019 (O&M) Date of decision-12.07.2021 (Heard through VC) Sanjay

...Petitioner

Vs.

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Rajesh K. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Rashmi Attri, AAG, Punjab.

*** JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of arrest in FIR No.107 dated 21.09.2019, under Sections 363 and 366 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Mehtiana, District Hoshiarpur. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is falsely implicated in the present case and on the direction of this Court, has joined the investigation. It is also contended that nothing is to be recovered from him.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Resham Singh submits that petitioner has joined the investigation and he is not required for the custodial interrogation.

GEETA RANI 2021.07.12 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-45681-2019 (O&M) --2In view of the facts that the petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation and has joined the investigation, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 24.10.2019 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (I) (ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE 12.07.2021 geeta Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes No Whether Reportable :

Yes No GEETA RANI 2021.07.12 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document