High Court of Punjab and HaryanaLPA/1606/2023dismissed

Pardeep And ORS. v. Financial Commissioner And ORS.

2026-02-16Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,Mr. Justice Vikas Suri3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Decided on :16.02.2026 PARDEEP AND ORS..

. .Appellant.

Versus

FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI PRESENT: Mr. K. S. Malik-I, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Rajeev Malhotra, DAG, Haryana.

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1.

In the present appeal, the challenge is to the impugned order dated 12.09.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP-20051-2023, by which, the remanding back the case to the authorities concerned for initiating the fresh partition proceedings in a manner required, has been upheld by the learned Single Judge.

In the present appeal, the appellants are only required to prove as to how the order passed by the authorities concerned which has been upheld by the learned Single judge, is perverse to the facts or settled principle of law. Even if, two views are possible, the view taken by the authorities which has been upheld by the learned Single Judge, cannot be interfered with merely because the appellants are projecting the other view to be accepted.

In the present appeal, the learned single judge has only upheld the order passed by the learned Financial Commissioner, by which, the case was remanded back to the concerned authorities for initiating the fresh partition proceedings in accordance with law.

-24.

Learned counsel for the appellants has not been able to show that as to how, the said order of the learned Financial Commissioner is perverse to the facts or settled principle of law. 5.

Hence, in learned Financial Commissioner

! "

! !

! #

$ # %

! & '

! ( #

) *+ ! ! (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) JUDGE 16.02.2026 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No

-3-