M/S Uprising Buildcon Pvt Ltd And ANR v. Avtar Singh And ORS

[116+233] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4640-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : 04.10.2024 M/s Uprising Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. & another ...Appellants versus Avtar Singh and others ....Respondents Coram :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

Present:

Mr. Santosh Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Vishavdeep Singh Rana, Advocate and Mr. Kerrein Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 (i) to 1 (iv), 2 & 3. Mr.Tanveer Singh, Advocate and Mr. Chetan Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.4.

*** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) CM-12346-C-2018 For the reasons recorded in the application, this Court is satisfied that the applicant-appellant has made sufficient cause for condonation of delay of 377 days in re-filing of the appeal. Application stands allowed and delay of 377 days in re-filing of the appeal is condoned.

CM-12347-C-2018 For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed. Deficiency of Court fee is made good.

RSA-4640-2018 [1] This appeal has been filed against judgment and decree dataeed 16.12.2016 passed the learned Addl. Judge, Patiala, dismissing the appeal of appellants and affirming the judgment and decree dated 19.03.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Divions), Rajpura.

RSA-4640-2018 (O&M) -2- [2] With the efforts of the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court, the matter stands compromised. Written compromise dated 17.05.2024 has been placed on record.

[3] The appeal is ordered to be disposed off in terms of compromise dated 17.05.2024. The decree be drawn. Compromise be made part of the decree.

[4] Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed off. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 04.10.2024 'R. Sharma'

Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.10.15 06:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document