Narender Alias Bacchi v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-51251-2023 Date of Decision: 16.10.2023 Narender @ Bachhi ......... PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Haryana ......... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for the peƟƟoner. Mr. Karan Sharma, D.A.G, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) FIR No.

Dated Police StaƟon SecƟons 06.11.2021 Barwala, District Hisar 120-B, 201, 307, 34, 216 IPC and 25 of Arms Act 1.

Aggrieved by dismissal of the bail by the Sessions Court despite the complainant not supported the case of the prosecuƟon, the peƟƟoner has again come up before this Court by filing third bail peƟƟon under SecƟon 439 Cr.P.C in the FIR capƟoned above.

2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner submits that he would like to withdraw the present peƟƟon with liberty to file a fresh peƟƟon before the trial Court with clarificaƟon that the trial Court should not resort to any observaƟons made on merits in the previous peƟƟon for the reason that now the complainant has turned hosƟle. 3.

The prayer is genuine, as such, the same is allowed. 4.

Given above, present peƟƟon stands disposed of having been withdrawn with liberty to the peƟƟoner that he may file a fresh bail applicaƟon before the trial Court and trial Court shall decide the said bail applicaƟon preferably within two weeks from the date of filing of the same without being influenced by the earlier rejecƟon by this Court or trial Court. Liberty reserved to the peƟƟoner to come to this Court again, if need arises. All pending miscellaneous applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 16.10.2023 JyoƟ-II JYOTI 2023.10.17 08:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No