← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/46196/2025disposed of

Amit Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Another

2025-08-22Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46196-2025 Date of Decision : 22.08.2025 AMIT KUMAR .... PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .... RESPONDENTS CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present :- Mr.Lekhraj Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) 1.

The instant petition has been filed for quashing of impugned order dated 24.07.2025 (Annexure P-3) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Panchkula whereby the bail earlier granted to the petitioner was cancelled, his bail bonds were forfeited to the State and nonbailable warrants of arrest were issued against him. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended the impugned order passed by the learned trial Court is wholly unsustainable in the eyes of law. It was argued that the petitioner had been regularly appearing before the Court ever since the grant of bail on 12.05.2022 and whenever he could not attend the proceedings, exemption applications were duly filed and allowed. On 24.07.2025, the petitioner could not appear due to the sudden demise of his mother-in-law and had to attend condolence ceremony. It was further contended that the absence of the petitioner was neither deliberate nor willful, but on account of circumstances beyond his control. The Anju Goel 2025.08.27 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-46196-2025 -2petitioner has not been declared a proclaimed offender and has approached this Court within twenty days of the impugned order, which clearly establishes his bona fide intent to comply with due process of law. 3.

Heard.

4.

Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to surrender himself before the trial Court and if he surrenders and moves an application for bail then the trial Court will consider his all the pleas raised before this Court and take a lenient view regarding grant of bail to the petitioner and decide his application on merits expeditiously.

5.

Disposed of.

(SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 22.08. 2025 anju Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No Anju Goel 2025.08.27 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh