Pataso Devi @Patasi Devi v. M/S Ujjawal Colonizer Pvt Ltd

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh 1.

Regular Second Appeal No. 3408 of 2014 (O&M) Pataso Devi alias Patasi Devi ... Appellant(s)

Versus

M/s Ujjawal Colonizer Pvt. Ltd.

... Respondent(s) AND 2.

C.O.C.P. No. 9907 of 2018 Pataso Devi ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Manoj, Manager, M/s Ujjawal Colonizer Pvt. Ltd. And Another ... Respondent(s) DATE OF DECISION: 19.12.2022 CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. N.C.Kinra, Advocate for the appellant (In RSA-3408-2014) and for the petitioner (In COCP-9907-2018).

Mr. S.K.Garg Narwana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent (In RSA-3408-2014) and for the respondent No.1 (In COCP-9907-2018).

Mr. Harsh Vardhan Shehrawat, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana and Mr. Jaspal Singh Pannu, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

In view of the affidavit of Mr. Raj Keerti, District Town Planner, Rohtak and a communication dated 28.11.2022 issued by the Administrator, Haryana Shehari Vikas Pradhikaran, Rohtak, the learned DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.12.20 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Regular Second Appeal No. 3408 of 2014 (O&M) And C.O.C.P. No. 9907 of 2018 counsel representing the appellant submits that his grievance stands redressed because the appellant has been provided with the path. 2.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the appeal as well as the petition for initiating the contempt proceedings are disposed of. 3.

The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, in the appeal shall stand disposed of.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge December 19, 2022 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.12.20 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document