Mahesh Dutt And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Decided on : 20.08.2024 MAHESH DUTT AND OTHERS . . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana.
Ms. Jasleen Kaur Chhibber, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Lal, Advocate for respondent No.9.
**** KIRTI SINGH , J. (Oral) By way of the instant petition, petitioners have approached this Court for seeking a direction to the official respondents for protection of life and liberty of petitioners and their family members and not to implicate the petitioners and their family members in false cases at the mere instance of disclosure statement of any co-accused, who are in police custody. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that there was a dispute regarding land of the petitioners No. 1 and 3 with the sarpanch of the village in the year 2012 and at that time one police official namely Karambir S/o Alok who is the resident of the same village was helping the sarpanch and in this regard firstly he tried to to implicate the petitioner no. 1 and 3 in some false cases and when he did not succeed then he falsely implicated the elder son namely Neeraj in a false case. It is further alleged that the police officials are harassing the petitioners and their family members and are demanding money/bribe and are threatening to kill the
- 2 - family members of the petitioners and also to implicate them in other criminal cases.
3.
Learned State counsel has drawn the attention of this Court to Paragraphs No.4 to 8 of the status report dated 18/19.09.2023 that has been filed by the State, which are reproduced as under : "4.
That the son of the petitioner no.1 Mahesh Dutt is a hardcore criminal and as per the record the following cases stand registered against the petitioner Neeraj son of Mahesh Dutt :
Sr. No.
FIR No./DT.
Status 1.
FIR No.19 DT. 10.02.2015 US 392, 302, 120B IPC PS CHHAINSA, FARIDABAD Acquitted on 23.10.2015 2.
FIR NO.199 DT. 2016 US 42 PRISON ACT PS SDR. BALB., FBD Acquitted on 01.02.2017 3.
FIR NO.395 DT. 15.12.2013 US 120B, 420, 467 IPC & 42A PRISON ACT AS SDR. BALB., FBD Acquitted on 01.02.2018 4.
FIR NO.06 DT. 04.01.2017 US 332, 353, 186 IPC PS CENTRAL, FBD Acquitted on 03.10.2018 5.
FIR NO. 528 DT. 17.12.2016 US 42 PRISON ACT PS SDR. BALB., FBD Acquitted on 20.10.2018 FIR NO. 33 DT. 06.01.2015 US 148, 149, 323, 506 IPC PS SDR., FBD Acquitted on 27.11.2015 FIR NO.307 DT. 05.09.2019 US 42A PRISION ACT PS BHONSI GURUGRAM On bail 8.
FIR NO.463 DT. 22.07.2019 US 302, 34 IPC & A.ACT PS CAMP PALWAL On bail 9.
FIR NO.569 DT. 28.01.2012 US 302, 34 IPC & A.ACT PS SEC. 08 FBD Convicted 10.
FIR NO.12 DT.15.01.2013 US 307, 186, 332, 353, 34 IPC & A.ACT PS SDR. BALB. FBD Acquitted on 11.09.2015 11.
FIR NO. 510 DT. 26.05.2017 US 42A PRISON ACT PS SADAR KARNAL Acquitted on 27.02.2019 12.
FIR NO.227 DT. 2017 US 506, 201, 34 IPC PS HODAL PALWAL Acquitted on 10.10.2019 13.
FIR NO.417 DT. 27.06.2019 US 120, 201, 212, 302 IPC & A.ACT PS SEC. 08 FBD Pending trial 14.
FIR NO.57 DT. 21.01.2019 US 395, 397, 120B IPC & A.ACT PS SADAR PALWAL On bail 15.
FIR NO. 557 DT. 29.09.2015 US 307, 323, 216, 148, 149, 506, 120B IPC PS CENTRAL FBD Pending trial 16.
FIR NO.222 DT. 04.04.2017 US 307, 386, 506, 114, 201, 120B IPC PS HODAL, PALWAL Pending trial 17.
FIR NO.169 DT. 28.08.2015 US 114, 201, 216, 307, 120B IPC & A.ACT PS HASANPUR PALWAL Pending trial 18.
FIR NO. 02 DT. 2015 US 323. 326, 324, 341, 148, 149, 120B IPC & A.ACT PS HASANPUR PALWAL Convicted on 30.10.2019
- 3 - 19.
FIR NO.172 DT.2013 US 148, 149, 506 IPC PS SADAR BALB. FBD Pending Trial 20.
FIR NO.563 DT. 15.12.2021 US 385, 506 IPC PS AADARSH NAGAR FBD Pending Trial 21.
FIR NO.93 DT. 23.03.2022 US 302, 34 IPC PS SADAR PALWAL Not arrested 22.
FIR NO.50 DT. 28.01.2012 US 454, 380 IPC PS CITY BALB. FBD 23.
FIR NO. 247 DT. 07.08.2022 PS SPL CELL, NEW DELHI 5.
That further it shall be pertinent to mention here that said Neeraj son of Mahesh Dutt has been categorized as most wanted criminal and a bounty of cash reward of Rs.25,000/- has been declared for him. That apart from that, the following cases stand registered against the petitioners Mahesh Dutt, Chand Ram and Vishnu Dutt: i.
FIR No.292 dated 18.07.2015 u/s 195A, 341, 506 & 34 IPC was registered against Chand Ram (Petitioner No.2) son of Mahesh Dutt. However, the accused was acquitted on 04.01.2017 in that case. ii.
FIR No.473 dated 25.06.2018 u/s Arms Act, PS, Sector 29, Gurugram is also pending in the Court of Ld. CJM, Gurugram on 11.10.2023, against Chand Ram (Petitioner No.2) iii.
FIR No.57/19 u/s 395, 397, 120B IPC and Arms Act PS, Palwal is pending against (petitioner) Chand Ram in the Court of Ld. ACJM, Palwal on 02.12.2023.
That apart from that, a criminal having emanated out of FIR No.292/12 u/s 454, 380 was also stand registered against Naresh son of Mahesh Chand.
8.
That the following cases stand registered against Sourabh son of Dharam Chand, a family member of petitioners:- a.
FIR No.315/16 u/s 323, 452, 506, 34 IPC PS, Bhupani (acquitted on 25.04.2017).
b.
FIR No.44/17 u/s 147, 149, 323, 506 and 452 IPC PS, Bhupani (acquitted 08.05.2023).
c.
FIR No.294/17 u/s 147, 149, 323, 506 and 452 IPC PS,Bhupani (acquitted on 14.12.2017).
d.
FIR No.358/17 u/s 148, 149, 307, 506 IPC PS, Bhupani (pending in the court of Ld. ASJ, Faridabad on 10.10.2023).
e.
FIR No.161/19 Arms Act, PS Tigaon (Pending in the
- 4 - court of Ld. JMIC, Faridabad on 20.03.2024).
f.
FIR No.65/19 u/s 174A IPC, PS Bhupani (Convicted in the court of Ld. JMIC, Faridabad on 22.02.2021)" 4.
From a perusal of the record it is apparent that the petitioners are involved in various criminal cases that have been registered against them. The family of the petitioners have a checkered criminal history and there are several cases pending against them. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that there is no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 20.08.2024 Kavita Nain Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No