Ved Kumari v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RA No.597-CI of 2016 (O&M) in RFA No.6142 of 2013 Date of decision: 4.11.2016 Ved Kumari ..... Applicant

Versus

State of Haryana and another ..... Non-applicants /Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL

Present:

Mr. N.C. Kinra, Advocate, for the applicant.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J Under the garb of review application, the appeal is sought to be re-argued on merits with the change of counsel, who was not counsel when the appeal was argued, which cannot be entertained. The review application is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the application seeking condonation of delay is also dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 4.11.2016 sharmila Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sharmila Devi 2016.11.10 11:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document