← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/23214/2023disposed of

M/S Garg Food Industry v. State Of Punjab And Others

2023-10-13Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 2023:PHHC:133504 CWP No.23214 of 2023 Date of Decision:13.10.2023 M/s Garg Food Industry ....Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Ajay Pal S.Gill, Advocate and Mr. Ripudaman S.Brar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Deepanjay Sharma, DAG, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to allot paddy for KMS 2023-24.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that petitioner got electricity connection on 02.09.2023, however, plant and machinery was not installed.

3.

This Court in CWP No. 20632 of 2023 alongwith connected cases decided on 10.10.2023 titled as "M/s Master Foods. vs. State of Punjab and others", in the wake of statement of learned State counsel, had directed the respondents to allot paddy to the petitioners therein who had got electricity connection on or before 02.09.2023. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.10.13 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP No.23214 of 2023 -2- 2023:PHHC:133504 4.

On being confronted with the fact that though petitioner has got connection on 02.09.2023 but plant and machinery was not installed, thus, its case is not covered by aforesaid judgment, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents may be directed to sympathetically consider case of the petitioner.

5.

The petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider claim of the petitioner sympathetically. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 13.10.2023 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: Yes/No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.10.13 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment