Geeta Devi Th Lrs v. Nathu
RA-RS No.18-C of 2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-RS No.18-C of 2015 (O&M) IN RSA No. 956 of 2013 Date of decision: 13.1.2017 Geeta Devi (deceased) through LRs .. Applicant vs Nathu ..Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present:
Mr. Sudhanshu Makkar, Advocate, for the applicant. Rajesh Bindal, J.
The main appeal was dismissed in limine on 14.7.2014 holding that the Will, which was challenged by the applicant, was not surrounded by suspicious circumstances. The applicant preferred Special Leave Petition, before Hon'ble the Supreme Court, which was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file review application before this Court. Hence, the present review application has been filed, on the plea raised before Hon'ble the Supreme Court that even if the Will is held to be valid, still Lichhma could bequeath only half of the property inherited by her, as the applicant herein who is daughter of late Nand Ram and Lichhma was to inherit half share in the property along with her mother after the death of her father. Learned counsel for the applicant has referred to specific pleadings to the fact that the applicant would inherit the property left by her father after his death along with her mother in half share each and her mother Lichhma at best could have executed the Will only to the extent of Sharmila Devi 2017.01.20 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RA-RS No.18-C of 2015 -2half of the property left by late Nand Ram, to which there is no specific reply. Lichhma had executed a Will in favour of her distant cousin. The rights of the predecessor-in-interest of the applicant could not be affected by the Will executed by late Lichhma to that extent. As this issue was not considered, in my opinion, the order dated 14.7.2014 dismissing the appeal in limine, deserves to be re-called.
Ordered accordingly.
The appeal is restored to its original number. Let the same be now listed as per roster on 31.1.2017.
The review application stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge 13.1.2017 sharmila Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No Sharmila Devi 2017.01.20 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document