Raj Kumar v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRR No. 1939 of 2024 Date of Decision: 03.10.2024 Raj Kumar ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Arman Goyal, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Ms. Harpreet Kaur, A.A.G., Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

Aggrieved by acceptance of two applicaƟons under SecƟon 311 CrPC vide which one police official HC Shiv Munni was summoned and another official ASI Azad Singh PW7 was re-summoned, the accused has come up before this Court. I have heard counsel for the parƟes and have also gone through the record.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

It is clarified that at the Ɵme of examinaƟon of witness HC Shiv Munni and re-examinaƟon of ASI Azad Singh PW7 ample opportunity be given and in case they need one adjournment for cross-examinaƟon, the Court should afford the same. The present peƟƟon is partly allowed. All pending applicaƟons, if any also stands disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 03.10.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.10.05 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh